12:35 About macroeconomic and crisis. Макроэкономика и кризис. | |
| About macroeconomic and crisis. Whether you reflected sometime over a question "Whence money undertakes?" Not in sense, - "overwork". And it is primary. How they get to economy? This question with one German financier has served in dispute as the precondition for article creation. Reasons were simple enough and even are primitive. If we have, for example, a certain society, with any certain monetary weight in it. (As, for example, Germany after World War II has begun restoration of that has distributed to the citizens on 50 marks.) that thus that the quantity of the goods, services, constantly grows in it (as is observed actually) and nobody "фальшивомонетничает" (That is doesn't pour in in economy of flat money) inflations in general can't be. (There can be only a deflation. That it is not observed actually. (The monetary weight obviously grows faster the commodity.) All explanations of the German financier about the credit party of monetary issue of the Central Banks didn't explain an overall picture. Yes, locally monetary weight at the moment of credit delivery increased. But on termination of a credit cycle it became even less, on interest rate size that should urge on a deflation even more. Through any time initial «50 marks on a nose» will simply disappear from economy - will leave on payment of percent. Money as those, doesn't remain. There are only credit debts which will be used as money. At continuation of this absurd, illogical process, money will become negative. Percent that continue to be raised further. It means that if you hold "dollar" for which should nobody in the hands, is an illusion. For it "someone", "somewhere" necessarily should. And at attempt to repay these debts, from you will beat out also your dollar, and that you have all. (For example, in a type of tax. After all the debtor "someone" is, as a rule, the state.) If the system with loan percent already has worked long enough you own negative size. Even, in spite of the fact that at you in hands a piece of paper in which you trust. To tell the truth, me has extremely surprised that the person who is professionally engaged "making of money from money" not in a condition intelligibly to answer the elementary in essence questions. Well really. Can't, for example, the physicist (let even ядерщик or the radio physicist) not to know Newton's laws, - base laws of mechanics. We have tried to simulate "economy" from three бауэров (farmers) and have forced them to trade among themselves, having given out them on start a quantity of money. "Financier" didn't understand a difference between the open and closed systems. All time strove to take money whence that "from outside", for service of our simulated economy. The beginnings then "to give out credits", - at all without understanding that with each cycle of crediting and returning of the credit with percent it only reduced monetary weight and thus turned off monetary circulation in a limit to zero. As the German financier couldn't formulate distinctly any model explaining this elementary discrepancy and all has ended with a classical question, - "if you such clever, - why such poor"?, - it was necessary to understand most. "The micro-economics on the most essence deals with open systems. For example, the separate firm, basically, can is unlimited long make the economic blessings. Realizing the production, it receives means for purchase of new parties of raw materials, hiring of workers, replacements of the worn out equipment. Further with their help the new economic blessings are made, their sale in the market again is carried out, then the next coil of purchase of factors of manufacture etc. Therefore quite legally follows to speak about existence processes at microlevel. | |
|
| |
| Всего комментариев: 0 | |
